Nuki 3.0 Pro

[Juergen (Jürgen Pansy)]

@WilWeber

The non pro 3.0 version still uses Bluetooth and can connect to the old/current bridge with the current http-api features? So for developers this will be the only useful setup, or? Of course, I’m also not interested that such devices “need to phone home”.

The Smart Lock 3.0 and 3.0 Pro can both be used with a bridge. And yes, currently there is no local API that allows direct interaction with the 3.0 Pro’s integrated WiFi. However, there is already a feature request for this and it’s not impossible to make this happen.

[Juergen (Jürgen Pansy)]

@gioparmy

Is it possible to use wifi of smart 3.0 pro with opener like a bridge? Tx

No. Not for the time beeing. There is already a feature request for this. If you want it, please vote for it.

[Murlicat (Christoph Knapitsch)]

Hi Jürgen!

I have also some questions regarding the new nuki

1. You said, there is a difference between the 3.0 pro and the normal 3.0 regarding the motor/gear. What are these differences? Is one more silent or long lasting or battery efficient?
2. You said, the 3.0 pro consumes about the same amount of energy with wifi on as the 2.0. What about the standard, non pro 3.0. Is it similar to the 3.0 pro with bridge or better or worse?

Thanks a lot for your reply,
Christoph

[gioparmy]

Thx, i vote for it now

[WilWeber (Wilhelm Weber)]

@Juergen

However, there is already a feature request for this and it’s not impossible to make this happen.

Ok. Thanks. But as I want to purchase and use the device within this decade, I’ll go with the nonPro version. It’s also not impossible that they get the fusion reactor working, some time

[Matteo_Vicini]

Hi @Juergen ,

Thanks for helping us out with addressing specific questions here, that’s much appreciated.

I hate to say I’m fairly disappointed after just receiving the Smart Lock 3 Pro, advertised as integrating the bridge, to then find out I need to fork out ~50% more money to buy a bridge in order to do what I planned to!!! As a result all my current intricated home automation system is totally incompatible with the Nuki integrations I expected to use!

Would you elaborate on where we are with the local HTTP API addition?
I really am considering returning the lock if this is far away in the clouds and please don’t take this as a threaten but it’s just a fact the lock now does about 10% of what’s advertised to do for me and my setup.

Lastly, you mentioned there’s a feature request for the local HTTP API but I could not find it after long scrolling. Would you point me in the right direction?

Thanks!

[Juergen (Jürgen Pansy)]

@Matteo_Vicini

Would you elaborate on where we are with the local HTTP API addition?

We do not comment about our roadmap here in the forum. If we can tell something about a planned feature request it is usually moved in the “planned” section.

@Matteo_Vicini

Lastly, you mentioned there’s a feature request for the local HTTP API but I could not find it after long scrolling. Would you point me in the right direction?

Correct. Seems that nobody opened one so far, therefore please do so. → Feature Request Form

Thank you!

[Patrick2909 (Patrick Seidenstricker)]

Hello, I am using the Nuki 3.0 Pro and integrated it into Apple HomeKit, I have the following problem, this morning at Apple Home it said “Device is not responding” and the push message that the door was unlocked did not come this morning either. Only when I deactivated WLAN at Nuki did the message arrive late. Otherwise, some push messages from Apple, when the door is opened or locked, do not arrive. If WiFi is off there are no problems, but then I don’t get any messages from Nuki, does anyone have an idea?

[Phuturist]

Can’t believe we actually have to request this.

Local API on SL3 (Pro)

Product name Nuki Smart Lock 3.0 (Pro) Summary The new Nuki Smart Lock 3.0 (Pro) features onboard WiFi. As of yet there is no functionality to control the lock locally using this onboard WiFi. Features Add at least an features from the bridge API to the Smart Lock 3.0 preferably with other long requested features like managing users and key codes and receiving this info when an event notification is send over the local API. Reason Because bridges and hubs suck. And cloud only devices suck…

None of my other feature requests are implemented so surprise me with this one.

[Nardol (Patrick Zajda)]

Hello,

Maybe I miss-read something but when reading th FAQ about differences between 3.0 and 3.0 pro there are no indications about the motor.
So is it the same for both and differences are only wifi and the ring?

[PeSi (Peter Sindel)]

Additional a chargeable battery pack is included!

[Nardol (Patrick Zajda)]

Yes, I forgot it thanks.
But no difference about the motor?
I already have a power pack and a bridge so if the only diferences are the power pack and these I wrote above I would like to be sure if I would have an advantage to buy the pro or not because even if I would have to pay for the door sensor it will be less expensive than the 3.0 pro with the free sensor. Except if there is something more in terme of functionalities.

[PeSi (Peter Sindel)]

Well I don’t know where you are located, but in Germany there is no free sensor in the box of the lock V3!
If you already have the bridge I would buy the lock V3 not the pro version. But I would invest the door sensor to have full control about the door.

[Nardol (Patrick Zajda)]

@PeSi

Well I don’t know where you are located, but in Germany there is no free sensor in the box of the lock V3!

Not for now but from February it will be the upgrade offer from Nuki:

Nuki Upgrade Program - Nuki

If you already have the bridge I would buy the lock V3 not the pro version. But I would invest the door sensor to have full control about the door.

I agree, it is a must have

[Rose_Languste]

Hi! Do the new door sensor just work with version 3, or also with the other former versions!? Thanks!

[hsafra (Harel Safra)]

Version 3 locks only for the new door sensor Nuki Door Sensor: Leave your home with peace of mind - Nuki

[Rose_Languste]

Thanks for the clarification!

[marcel1 (Marcel Nowak)]

I bought the 3.0 Pro because of built in WiFi. My AppleTV is to far away for Bluetooth HomeKit.
I want to use Homebridge, but need to buy a Nuki Bridge first? This cant be real.
Please release a feature that 3.0 Pro gets an HTTP-API so we can use it with homebridge!
Please, this has to happen.

[codi-modi (Eagle)]

I had the same experience but if you compare how much the internal bridge needs yearly energy vs. a real bridge, one realize that the internal bridge is just a “light” version of the real, very fast responsive, powerful bridge. but that’s ok. some are fine with the “light bridge” and some need the real bridge with much more power, responsiveness, speed, and functions.

[marcel1 (Marcel Nowak)]

Thats true. Im wondering if its possible or if there is any plugin for homebridge out there that uses Nuki Web API (web.nuki.io). When im able to trigger the door latch via web browser, why not via homebridge->homekit? No Bridge and no Bridge API would be needed in that case.